Navigation Menu

Showing posts with label Change. Show all posts

Employee Motivation 101: No, Keep the Pompoms


Organisational tasks can be mundane and boring at times – let’s not kid ourselves. We’ve all had to experience that feeling of perpetually working on the same given responsibilities. Having to key in mountains of data; filing of a never-ending increase stack of documents; making routine phone calls to clients who have never answered your calls; a constant back-and-forth between two points. Eventually, demotivation takes over, we start withdrawing our commitment to the organisation, and end up delivering just enough to get by.

When faced with demotivated employees, what can organisational leaders to do undo the damage? 


Expressing gratitude to your employees is a fundamental step-one to recognising their efforts to the organisation. It doesn’t have to be anything grand or spectacular, a simple gesture is usually enough to get them back on track – a simple face-to-face ‘thank you; treating the team to a nice lunch – making sure your employees are aware that their work is appreciated.


Another way is to engage with your employees to understand the source of their demotivation. Communicate with them to figure out why they have been disconnected with their tasks-at-hand, and discuss potential ways in reestablishing their motivation. What’s important is not to dismiss their concerns, and instead identify underlying causes of demotivation within the organisation, in order to prevent future cases from surfacing.


It becomes difficult to commit to the organisation when employees just see themselves as cogs in the machine. Take the initiative to remove any notions of unimportance by letting them know how they contribute to the growth and development of the organisation. Foster a sense of accountability within employees, which functions to improve the connection between them and their tasks – and by extension, the organisation.

However, these steps do not suggest that employers are wholly accountable for re-motivating their employees. The onus is also on organisational personnel themselves in figuring out the source of their demotivation, or on working with those who are actively helping them back on track – such as employers who are using the previously mentioned approaches! It takes two to tango, and the responsibility lies with both employee and employer in delivering 100% to their responsibilities.


Image Source:
(1) ciphr.com
(2) leadershipmanagement.com.au
(3) myronstaana.net
(4) centerforworklife.com

Benjamin Lee Cheng Han | Benjamin is a student of International Relations at the University of Nottingham, currently exploring unchartered realms in the Public Relations field. Writing is clearly his interest – a decisive contributor to his foray into the public relations industry. To date, he boasts the proud record of having tamed one of the office cats, and drinking expired tea from the pantry.

Following the Leader! (only if the leader knows where to go)



When undergoing change, leadership involvement is imperative to an overall successful and sustainable change process. Sure, there are other factors which directly impact the potential effect of change, including (but not limited to) financial planning, organisational personnel engagement, and familiarity with the organisation’s industry position. However, preparedness begins at the helm of the organisation, and leaders represent an important facet of ensuring effective change.

Without leaders implementing the correct strategy and execution of ideas, little to no progress of the change project at hand is undertaken. Organisational personnel are not given a clear understanding about the expectations involved with the change, and subsequent procedures become increasingly difficult to operationalise. Misalignment within leadership creates a disjointed mentality within the organisation, creating a negative climate amongst personnel which jeopardises change processes.

Transparency within leadership is also a key factor contributing to lasting and effective change within an organisation. When leaders are unwilling to share intellectual capital with their teams and hold on to their knowledge, they fail to enhance the intellectual capacity of the organisation. Change is difficult to initiate if leaders have differing intentions to that of organisational goals, especially if they prioritise personal wellbeing over building change momentum and benefitting those involved with the change at hand.

Another aspect in establishing successful change is if leaders identify a common organisational language which can be effectively understood and applied across all aspects of the organisation. For instance, leaders should align the organisation under a uniform image, either externally or internally, in order to establish change momentum as well as a consistent organisational image. Through this, the change process isn’t disrupted by sudden alterations to common objectives or manners of executing change procedures.

When leaders have clarity in purpose and focus, and are aligned with the organisational philosophy and goals, only then can effective change efforts be conducted. Through the implementation of appropriate strategies, organisational transparency, and by having a standard system throughout the organisation, leaders have the capacity to initiate successful and lasting change. The link below leads to an article which further elaborates on the importance of leadership clarity and alignment in change management.

Inspiration:

Image Source: worldventures.com

Benjamin Lee Cheng Han | Benjamin is a student of International Relations at the University of Nottingham, currently exploring unchartered realms in the Public Relations field. Writing is clearly his interest – a decisive contributor to his foray into the public relations industry. To date, he boasts the proud record of having tamed one of the office cats, and drinking expired tea from the pantry.

Reinvention Part III - The Reinvention Formula

Following on from the Six Deadly Blindfolds, The Reinvention Formula looks closely at what is important to factor in to change within an organisation, and to what extend various organisational level factors influence the opportunity for growth and development.

When this notion was first presented to me by the authors of Reinvention: Accelerating Results in the Age of Disruption, like with much of what they were saying, it struck a chord and resonated with my own thinking. I may not be perfect at embracing all that was said, but I do recognise how, over time, each and every influencing factor has been important, and upon reflection, see where I could have done things better. Hindsight is always a valuable tool, but foresight, and the ability to really hone in on what is important, is even more so.

By sharing Cragun and Sweetman’s reinvention Formula, I hope that I can open you your reflection on changes within your organisation (and within yourself as either leader or entrepreneur); but I do strongly advocate buying the book and reading in detail – for I cannot do sufficient justice to the concept in this short post.

The Formula

I feel like I am back at a High School calculus class again:


Simple as that!

Let’s explore further:

(D x F x A x E) or the Change Quotient. Four elements; bold choices to be made to achieve the future outcome. Needing to be tightly aligned, its important to be certain of these factors, and understand their interrelationships, dynamics, and politics.

D  Dissatisfaction – Simply put, dissatisfaction for the status quo. We feel something isn’t right; its not working the way it was envisioned, or the organisation has simply outgrown the mode of operation. This dissatisfaction is a key driver for the need to change, as we recognise that “there must be a better way”. However, our unhappiness at the existing state of affairs is never going to be enough to effect change. We need more!

F  Focus – An epiphany almost; well, maybe not that strong. It is an awareness of where we should be, given our existing concerns. Strong focus is an incredible motivator, as many of the existing barriers which were once seen become minimised in some way – most often or not, psychologically, as we don’t see them as barriers. Our determination overrides them.

A  Alignment – Building up what we need to make it happen. Human resources, mindset, equipment, funding. Bringing together the cochophony of resources that will enable our desired change to be instigated.

E  Execution – Argueably, the most important. The actual “making it happen”. Often though, this involves doing things that we haven’t experienced before (it wouldn’t be change otherwise), so these are uncharted territory for many of us. We simply have to believe in our teams, our resources, and lead regardless. Onwards and upwards.

The combination together becomes exponentially more powerful. Without any of the factors, the impetus to change dwindles, and the effect of any effort is going to be less significant.

To be successful, all these factors must come into play together and feed off each other. Only then do we start to get strong, confident change.

L  Leadership – Albeit hugely symbolic, this factor is a solidifying and extremely empowering to the process. Strong leadership acts as both a guide and a fallback – for support when times are uncertain. Leadership is described as a Force Multiplier; something that dramatically increases the effectiveness of the action.

We all know just how powerful leadership can change not only mindsets, but worlds too. We have seen that recently with the American elections, and we have seen it extensively in the past. At an organisational level, leaders with a strong vision and a commitment to achieve that become strong guides for the journey, but they also ensure that the combination of resources and other mitigating factors are the best available at the time.

Being a leader is tough, but it is also very rewarding, and this reward filters down strongly to all involved.

Leaders need to work hard at building trust, credibility, respect. When these exist, your followership will be enhanced, and your team will be willing to walk over metaphorical hot coals for you. It is at this stage where you are truly a team – as a real team only exists when everyone has everyone elses best interests at heart.

C  Cost of Change – Be it financial, psychological, or humanistic, there is always a cost to change. In any action, progress occurs when the benefits of the change outweigh the cost. In this case, our above equations need to be stronger than the actual cost of change – for only then is it worth undertaking the effort.

But don’t get caught up on the definition of cost being financial. Often, the cost is more humanistic, or in terms of what may be lost to the organisation. Sometimes dollars and cents do not need to factor in. Just ensure that the benefits outweigh the detriments.

So, this is the Reinvention Formula. Nothing profoundly different; but a great opportunity to reexamine how so many factors need to come together to power other factors to achieve positive outcomes. Think long and hard about the resources you are involving for change, and be sure that they are aligned to support the initiative, rather than hinder it.

Image Source: leaderonomics.com

Craig J Selby | Craig is a long-time proponent of structured and measured change. His early career saw him teaching marketing and management at a variety of Universities and PTE’s in his native New Zealand, where he quickly climbed the management ladder to head several private sector institutes. Needing to do that little bit extra, Craig formed his own consultancy firm and was engaged by many in the sector as a trouble-shooter - responsible for internal auditing, restructuring and redevelopment of many departments and institutes in order to remain competitive in a highly contested market. This involvement motivated him to branch out and work with other industries - focussing on change and development as a core theme in business survival. When Craig moved to Malaysia, he went back into the Education sector to share his ideas with local private sector educational facilities. In 2009 Craig co-founded Orchan Consulting Asia, an award-winning Public Relations agency. His areas of specialisation are Crisis Management Communications and Change Management.

Is Your Employee Ready to be a Manager?


A mistake that many start-ups and SME’s make is in promoting staff simply too fast. I say it’s a mistake for start-ups and SME’s because if I were to generalise, I know other commentators would simply say “it’s a millennial thing” – this wanting to climb fast – but I disagree. It applies equally to my generation (I was once an eager, overly-enthusiastic cog in the machinery, keen to climb that ladder – and I did, fast too) as well as the generations before me. As human beings, we seek progress, and for many of us, cross-generational, that equates in part, to promotions at the workplace.

So back to start-ups and SME’s – a smaller team, more interaction, possibly more micro-managing. With a smaller team comes the fear of external professionals entering the tight-knit workplace community and overshadowing others; hence the model of promoting from within and hiring at the lowest levels, becomes an easy to practice norm. I know, for I have done just that on many occasions – not only for practical purposes of maintaining morale and balance, but also for trust reasons.

The question however is not whether we should model our promotion based on these factors, but rather, when is the right time to promote a team member internally, and how do we as entrepreneurs, handle this transition through training, support, and the process of adding responsibility?

We need to consider several factors – does the Job Title outweigh other job factors (eg; achievement, financial, camaraderie); what is our team members’ realistic learning curve; and ultimately, are we setting this person up as our protégés because we want them to be, or is it the right, medium-to-long-term decision for the business? Not every employee wants to stay long-term – some seek to get a variety of experience, and internal promotion conflicts with their ultimate goal of achieving industry-wide experience (and recognition). These are hard questions, but they are also particularly relevant questions, as our goal is always a blend of strategic business practice and team member respect. Walking that tightrope can be tough.

So, when becomes the right time to promote a team member internally? Should we make them compete against outsiders for the opportunity? Let’s work through this.

The right time is always when they are ready. As an entrepreneur, my strategy is to “turn up the screws” slowly, step-by-step, to see whether the person is ready. Let the job title follow the increase in responsibility, rather than it be a knee-jerk approach of promotion then increased responsibility. Keep it organic, slowly growing the team members skills, and letting them take autonomy in responsibility, and have a hand in their position direction. By the time you announce a promotion, the cries of “I’m not sure that I’m ready” can be met with “well, you’ve been doing it for the past three (3) months” – sometimes a great confidence booster. 

I find this approach ideal for small teams – it helps build the team, the team members’ self-confidence, and the promotion (and associated increase in benefits) is a reward for proven work. It also reduces performance stress of the individual, as they don’t get bogged down in the “can I handle this?” mentality which is too often associated with promotions. The counter; during the process, they may feel that they could be taken advantage of. A legitimate concern is they could feel their workload increasing – hence, it needs to be an organic process over a few months.

If we intend to do a pure promotion and ask for applicants, including internal, we pit our team members against outsiders, and this can be disconcerting within a team. Knowing that the boss wants to consider me, but is asking outsiders to participate, by default implies that I have already been put out of the picture – for why would they seek outside involvement if I am already the right candidate? This can affect morale. 

It is a challenge, and the answer, at least for smaller business units, it to take a very organic and measured approach – continue to build your team and support them with training, new opportunities, etc, along the way.


Now let’s address the issue of promotion to Manager. The position of Manager has requisite skillsets which are not part of lower level positions, and may not have formed part of the position experience for staff in a smaller business. This needs specific training, plus many will say; a predisposition towards leadership. Well, yes and no! In an SME environment, simply because of the very nature of the business, and the fluidity of responsibility, chances are the team member will be constantly immersed in opportunity for leadership development. The relative autonomy that comes through working in smaller businesses means employees tend to step up to the plate a lot more readily than in a traditionally structured or hierarchical organisation. This, is the training ground.

As such, entrepreneurs should feel more confident that a certain team member seeking promotion to Manager probably has embedded themselves in the skills, and ultimately is more able to handle the new responsibility.


The issue is timing! Promotion needs to be proven to have been earned. Don’t promote as a trade-off for a salary increase, or because you feel guilty that the person isn’t getting a new job title every six months; promote because the person is ready and they can continue to contribute positively to the organisation with their new responsibilities.

Anyhow, for some additional thoughts on this, take a look at the following article from Harvard Business Review (HBR) by Rebecca Knight. Whilst I don’t see eye-to-eye on every point, the context and broad approach is part of every entrepreneur’s journey in developing their own skills in managing teams and people.
_________________________________________ 

You have an ambitious team member who’s asking to be promoted to manager. He’s great at his job, but is he really ready to lead? How do you judge his skills and experience? What’s the best way to measure his potential?

What the Experts Say

As a manager, you’re always on the lookout for the next generation of talent in your organisation. But trying to figure out whether a particular direct report is management material is not always straightforward, says Anna Ranieri, executive coach and author of the forthcoming Connecting the Dots: Telling the Story to Advance Your Career. “It requires different skills to manage than to be an individual contributor,” she says. “And since you want your decision to promote to be the right one, you wonder, ‘How do I make a sure enough bet?’” The good news is that, “people can develop their capacity to lead,” says Linda Hill, professor at Harvard Business School and the coauthor of Being the Boss: The 3 Imperatives for Becoming a Great Leader. “What you’re looking for is behavioral evidence that this person has the potential and talents to manage.” If you’re successful in the evaluation stage, you’ll be in a better position to “anticipate the person’s weaknesses so you can help onboard him into a management role when the time comes.” Here are some ways to go about it.

Gauge Interest

A good starting point, according to Ranieri, is to determine whether your ambitious direct report is, in fact, “interested in,” and, “geared toward management,” and not just “going through the motions, and thinking that she’s been at the organisation a certain number of years so it’s time for a promotion.” The best way to find out is to ask her. “Say, ‘Do you want to be in management? What’s your view of what that means? And what makes you think you would be good for that kind of role?’” Of course, notes Hill, you must “pay attention to what the person has done, not just what she says.” Ask yourself, “Have I ever seen an instance where this candidate took on a leader-like role, not just a star performer role?” You should also try to figure out whether the person has “the right motivation to want to lead,” which Hill defines as the desire to “shape the context and coach others.”

Assess Experience

Hill then recommends finding out what other management experiences the person has had. After all, roles like captaining a college field hockey team or editing a school literary magazine provide valuable leadership experience. She also suggests asking, “How do you spend your time outside of work? Perhaps this person volunteers and recently ran a campaign for a nonprofit. That shows she likes to mobilise others and lead.” Having the experience is key, but you’re also looking for evidence of growth, says Ranieri. “It’s important to test the person on his people skills and self-knowledge,” she says. The goal is to identify, “how he inspires others to work hard and give it their best. Ask, ‘What made you believe you were successful in that role?’”

Test Organisational Know-How

Once you have a sense of the aspiring manager’s interest level and past experience, you need to get a handle on her “understanding of the organisation—its culture, its needs, and where she thinks it’s going,” says Ranieri. “If you think her opinions are inaccurate [or disagree with her assessment], it’s appropriate to push back or at least continue the conversation,” she says. “Maybe you will learn something.” Raneiri suggests asking the candidate to provide examples of current managers who are successful and—without naming names—cite ways in which other executives could improve. Your goal is judge whether this candidate understands the role and find out how she would run this particular team. It’s also important to evaluate the candidate’s contextual intelligence or CQ, says Hill. “Can he see the big picture? Can he connect the dots? Can he think systemically?” CQ, according to Hill, is a critical component of leadership “given the complexity of management today. Without it, you have trouble prioritising and thinking about what your group should be working on, not just what it could be working on.”

Seek Other Opinions

Even if the ultimate hiring decision is yours, Ranieri suggests you discuss the prospective manager’s potential with other colleagues and fellow team leaders. Your inquiry needn’t be stealth. Ranieri recommends asking the candidate for references by saying something like, “‘I would like to talk to other people who’ve seen you act in a managerial way.’ This gives the individual time to seek out colleagues and remind them of examples [that speak to] his management potential.” It’s imperative, says Hill, to “solicit feedback from a range of individuals” in the business. She recommends paying special attention to what the candidate’s close associates have to say. “Maybe the bosses are happy, but peers tell a different story,” she says. That’s valuable information.

Observe

It’s also important to observe your ambitious report in action, says Ranieri. Notice whether she is “a person who comes to staff meetings and has ideas not only about her tasks but also about other things going on in the organisation.” In other words: does she have a vision for the company and “is she someone who wants to have a broader reach?” Think about your impressions of this person. Is she curious? Is she a learner? When she faced setbacks, did she exhibit resilience? Who does she go to for assistance? Is she a loner or does she have a network? If you don’t see evidence of the traits you’re looking for or you remain uncertain of her capabilities, Hill suggests providing “little experiences” that will prepare her for a leadership role. You might, for instance, ask your report to lead an upcoming project. Or suggest she spearhead a new initiative. “Encourage the person to take the opportunity to practice these skills,” she says.

Heed Red Flags

When evaluating management potential, there are certain negative characteristics to be on the lookout for, according to Hill. Beware of those who are not open to feedback. And think twice about candidates “who very rarely take into account other people’s points of view.”  Try to determine whether or not the person exhibits professional courage. “If he won’t stretch himself, to me, that show he is not ambitious enough,” she says. Also look out for those who are not generous. “A person who doesn’t work well with other people and who thinks he’s smarter than, or better than, others,” does not make for a good manager. “You want leaders who give credit freely, who acknowledge the achievements of others, who don’t punish people for their foibles, and who are willing to help.”

Have Faith

The thing is, “no one is going to score a perfect 10,” says Hill. Don’t lose sight of the fact that you’re “measuring a person’s potential” and determining whether someone is ready to be a boss isn’t a perfect science. Ranieri points out that it’s also helpful to remember your own experience. “Think back to when you took on your first managerial role or your first big project,” she says. “Maybe you weren’t sure you could do it. But someone took a leap of faith on you. Even if you weren’t 100% successful the first time, you eventually got there.” Besides, if you do decide to promote this ambitious colleague, she won’t be jumping without a safety net. “It’s your job to help other people develop.”

Principles to Remember

Do
- Ask the candidate what she thinks management entails and how she would manage a team.
- Try to evaluate a candidate’s people skills, including empathy and self-knowledge.
- Get a sense of the candidate’s grasp of the organisation by asking her how she views its culture, needs, and direction.

Don’t
- Overlook a candidate’s management experiences outside of work; leading an athletic team or a squad of volunteers provides solid leadership practice.
- Ignore red flags. If a person isn’t curious or doesn’t work well with others, reconsider his candidacy.
- Forget that someone earlier in your career showed faith in you. If you believe the candidate has the potential and talent to lead, help her develop.



Image Source:
(1)   businesswomenrising.com
(2)   emiemarketing.com
(3)   housesellingspecialists.com
(4)   naturesafariindia.com

Craig J Selby | Craig is a long-time proponent of structured and measured change. His early career saw him teaching marketing and management at a variety of Universities and PTE’s in his native New Zealand, where he quickly climbed the management ladder to head several private sector institutes. Needing to do that little bit extra, Craig formed his own consultancy firm and was engaged by many in the sector as a trouble-shooter - responsible for internal auditing, restructuring and redevelopment of many departments and institutes in order to remain competitive in a highly contested market. This involvement motivated him to branch out and work with other industries - focussing on change and development as a core theme in business survival. When Craig moved to Malaysia, he went back into the Education sector to share his ideas with local private sector educational facilities. In 2009 Craig co-founded Orchan Consulting Asia, an award-winning Public Relations agency. His areas of specialisation are Crisis Management Communications and Change Management.

More Female Leaders | A CEO’s Best Investment


In today’s major organisations, women begin to be less visible as they climb up the corporate ladder. In Malaysia, a recent report by business consultancy, Grant Thornton, revealed that gender diversity still has the least number of women involved in senior management roles within the Asean region. With only 26% of women represented in top management roles, it is vitally important to boost and encourage a corporate culture that supports more talented women into key decision-making positions.

But, you may likely ask, “Why?”

If you ever heard about the girl effect – a movement in which you invest in the education of young and unique potential of girls in developing nations, you help local communities much more than by giving any other form of aid. As reported by the Clinton Global Initiative, closing the gender gap in education adds half a percent to a country’s per capita gross national product; that when women work, they invest 90% of their income back into their families, as compared with only 35% for men – which marks an incredibly powerful effort for the economy.  



Being the CEO of Tupperware Brand Corporation, Rick Goings knew for sure that companies miss out on tremendous business advantages if women are neglected as part of the management team. To him, the economic decision to disregard female empowerment is a ridiculous action. Having been around the industry for years, he realised that CEO plays a pivotal role in not only thriving the profitability of their company, it is also of their responsibility to ensure diversity and equality in the enterprise to help improve the company bottom line.

Many business models today face a plethora of challenges involving three (3) fault lines: technology, talent, and demographic change; companies have to be able to reinvent themselves from the older corporate culture in order to cope with the new challenges ahead. This, however, requires a workforce with a broad skillset; and this is when the executive management roles hire people who can be efficient cogs in the corporate machine. For this reason, Rick Goings learned a great lesson in receiving better returns and work outcomes by looking for a broader range of abilities and capabilities upon the recruitment process. 

Check out the article below which provides further insights on how “female” factor works best for a radical transformation of gender diversity at the workplace.
_______________________________________

The Female Factor

Too many companies today are still holding on to a corporate culture that sidelines these qualities, especially at the top. What they are missing is leadership diversity – or, pardon the buzzword, the “female factor”.

In my experience, women excel when it comes to getting the task done through collaboration, teamwork and critical thinking. They approach problem-solving and decision-making differently from their male counterparts and it is this kind of diversity in thinking that prevents a homogenous mindset, strengthens a business and propels it forward. Recruiting and promoting women is a very straightforward injection of skills that improves the company’s ethos and its business results.

Frankly, it’s a triple win – for the company, family and community, and society as a whole. At Tupperware Brands, we are heavily focused on women in business, on coaching them to succeed. To understand the impact, we looked closely at the outcomes. We are proud but not surprised that many of our senior line officers are women. Ditto for country managing directors – even in markets where machismo still reigns.

The same goes for our sales organization. In Mexico, for example, 99% of our female sales force improved their financial situation, and as a result 50% doubled the investment in their children’s education. Thanks to the right training, they also gained in confidence, and many now see themselves as leaders – ready to create opportunities and jobs.

On the other side of the globe, in Indonesia, the results are just as impressive. Our sales force did north of $200 million in sales last year offering women – who are typically shut out of the regional economy – a way to move beyond set social rules and rise above the poverty line. Thanks to the right training and opportunity, many of these women confidently build their own businesses and reap the rewards. They spend more on their children’s education, gain respect in their family, and nearly half of them now have the time and money to support others in the community.

Putting It to Action

So how can companies make it work? It starts with the right mindset, and at the top.

At Tupperware Brands, we have made sure that the same number of men and women sit on our board. We do not promote women because we feel obliged to, but because it is the right business decision. I recommend that you first think about the skillset and structure that your company needs, and then build the workforce that helps you achieve that.

Once you have filled the internal leadership pipeline with the right mixture of people and plenty of female factor, do three things: invest, train and mentor. Trust me: this pays off immensely, because the female factor is real. I have irrefutable proof it works.

Inspiration: A CEO's Best Investment? More Women Leaders

Chia Yi Jing | Bubbling with enthusiasm, bright ideas, and confidence, Yi Jing set foot in the PR world with Orchan Consulting, where she was offered permanent employment after a successful internship. She is determined to make her mark in the industry, and her bosses know that she will. 

Reinvention II – The Six Deadly Blindfolds

We are all guilty!

We are guilty of not seeing the bigger picture. We are guilty of sweeping something under the carpet because it is easier than tackling head on. Whether it be clouding (external forces) or our own distractions (internal forces), this ‘missing the point’ can result in decision-makers making ill-informed choices.

We need to address the very real blindspots in our decision-making processes. From that point, we see in a clearer fashion, the reality of circumstances, and can make informed, intelligent decisions to move forward to the next level.



At the recent launch of “Reinvention: Acceletating Results in the Age of Disruption” by Shane Cragun and Kate Sweetman, Kate spent time highlighting the Six Deadly Blindfolds that impact upon entrepreneurs, managers and decision-makers. These resonated strongly with the entire audience, as we all recognized that at some stage along our managerial career path, we have been guilty of at least one, if not several, of these. I for one, recognise times where I have experienced, and acted based upon, each of the blindfolds. Does this make me a bad manager? No. It now makes me more conscious of factors clouding my judgement.

Whilst we cannot change the past, we can become increasingly more proactive in our critical analysis of the events surrounding us, and as such, will be better placed to strengthen our choices for our respective organisations and stakeholders into the future.

The Six Deadly Blindfolds analogy is apt for business decision-makers to contemplate. Recognise when these blindfolds have held influence over your decisions, and more importantly, use this framework to think through future decisions. If you answer ‘yes’ to the following question, then you know what you need to do – “am I missing something in the bigger picture as I analyse the scenario that I face”?

Arrogance

Often as simple as pride, or refusing to accept that something is happening. We feel that we can rise above it, or that our position is already sufficiently strong enough. Regardless of how strong your current situation is, there is always room for improvement. Complacency will be the death of success.

Professing that your way of doing something is the only correct avenue is also a form of arrogance. This is obviously the major inhibitor to change; change needing strong, positive leadership from throughout the hierarchy for it to succeed.

Simply ask yourself: “Am I always right”, or “Is there a better way”, and you will know whether or not you are limiting yourself due to this blindfold.

Negative Feedback Not Acknowledged Here


Many individuals, and business units fail in acknowledging and addressing less than stellar feedback that is offered to them. People try to brush over feedback as an anomaly in the spectrum, rather than a genuine issue. For example, if only one out of twenty customers at a restaurant complain that the waiter was unhelpful; then it means the waiter was good at his job. NO! Flip this around; if one customer complains – listen, investigate, rectify. There may be a real issue at hand. All feedback must be given credence for analysis – through feedback we will understand stronger perspectives, and potentially be exposed to new ideas which will help us to improve.

Dismissing Competitors Successes


Never take it lightly that a small competitor is making headway. A 0.5% improvement for them might be the start of the tipping point for you. We must always celebrate success, even when it is not our own; but use others success as a learning curve to develop a deeper understanding of the strategy they used to achieve that outcome.

In our appreciation of the landscape in which we operate, a key element is in understanding why others are progressing the way in which they do. Never take competitors for granted, and never, ever, take your finger off the pulse.

We Know What’s Best for the Customer

Businesses don’t invest enough in understanding their customer, and craft products and services to suit the delivery model, rather than to suit the end user. This is us knowing what is best for our convenience; not creating the best experience for our customer base.

We need to spend more time understanding our customer; their needs, current position, aspirations. From there we can customize, as much as achievable, the required product or service to suit them.

Do we really want to go back to the Henry Ford days – “you can have any colour car you want, as long as it is black”? I think not!

Believing Problems Don’t Exist


Much like Arrogance, we often tend to ignore problems as inconsequential, or non-existent. This is a huge mistake. No business has it 100% smooth. No business spends its lifespan with smooth sailing. There will always be problems. But we have to acknowledge their existence in order to first rectify them, and subsequently, improve our deliverability from them.

Embrace your problems, and use them as (steep) learning curves. Accept that from each problem the organization will come out stronger, for having experienced, and overcome the issue at hand.

Avoiding the Unavoidable


That delicate conversation you have to have with a client or a team member. That delay which put everything off track, but you’re still trying to carry on as if it didn’t happen. Reality is; as with crisis management, it is easier to bite the bullet as early as possible and deal with things, than it is to try and cover something up.

We are all guilty!

So, how many of these are you guilty of within your own organisations? Which seemed familiar, or struck a nervous chord within your mind? The first step is in acknowledging the things that impact our thinking process/es, and our decision-making processes, and moving forward positively, knowing that we can overcome these obstacles at each step, if only we are honest to ourselves.

Image Source:
(1)   leaderonomics.com
(2)   smallbiztrends.com
(3)   entrepreneur.com
(4)   sfs.jordon.com
(5)   linkedin.com

Craig J Selby | Craig is a long-time proponent of structured and measured change. His early career saw him teaching marketing and management at a variety of Universities and PTE’s in his native New Zealand, where he quickly climbed the management ladder to head several private sector institutes. Needing to do that little bit extra, Craig formed his own consultancy firm and was engaged by many in the sector as a trouble-shooter - responsible for internal auditing, restructuring and redevelopment of many departments and institutes in order to remain competitive in a highly contested market. This involvement motivated him to branch out and work with other industries - focussing on change and development as a core theme in business survival. When Craig moved to Malaysia, he went back into the Education sector to share his ideas with local private sector educational facilities. In 2009 Craig co-founded Orchan Consulting Asia, an award-winning Public Relations agency. His areas of specialisation are Crisis Management Communications and Change Management.